Resources IRB Members
Thank you for your invaluable contribution of time and expertise. Please use the resources below when conducting your IRB reviews.
Other Checklists:
- IRB Approval Criteria
- Informed Consent Approval Criteria
- Additional Protections for Children in Research
- Additional Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses and Neonates Involved in Research
- Additional Protections for Prisoners in Research
- Waivers and Alterations of Consent
IRB Member Responsibilities
All IRB members have the following responsibilities:
- To be committed to the protection of human subjects in research
- To attend IRB meetings on a regular basis, arriving on time and staying for the entire session whenever possible
- To evaluate the assigned protocols according to the 3 principles in the Belmont Report and according to the policies and procedures as outlined in the IRB Member Handbook prior to the meeting
- To determine which applications, if any, require more than annual consideration, and to determine which projects, if any, require verification of any facts from sources other the investigator
- To approve or to establish any conditions necessary for approval to protect subjects, or to disapprove any research activities reviewed by the IRB, with full explanation to applicants
- To have the authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process
- To undertake any special projects necessary to assure that the committee's decisions are as fully informed as possible
- To request aid of non-voting consultants, if necessary
- To respect the confidentiality of review materials and member discussions at the meetings
- To provide advice and counsel to research groups, departments and individual investigators
- To review material regarding protection of human subjects which is to be distributed to campus faculty and administrative offices
- To help implement Governmental and University policy regarding human research
Community Members Are Crucial to Successful IRB Processes
All research involving human participants is required to be reviewed by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to ensure that the rights and welfare of participants are protected. IRBs are made up of both scientists and those who are not scientists (community members). Community members play important and valuable roles in:
- Providing non-scientific perspectives when research is reviewed
- Helping to ensure that written materials make sense to those without scientific backgrounds
- Helping to identify potential ethical concerns that may impact your community