Continuing Review

🔄What is Continuing Review?

If you want to continue working on a study beyond its expiration date, you must submit the study to the IRB for continuing review approval. The IRB re-reviews the study to determine if it is appropriate for the study to continue, as is or with modifications.

Continuing review is required even if: 

  • No changes have been made since the last approval
  • The only study activity is subject follow-up
  • The only study activity is data analysis involving identifiable study data
  • The only study activity is manuscript preparation involving identifiable study data

📅How Often Is Continuing Review is Required?

Most studies must undergo continuing review annually. However, there is some variation to this requirement. The IRB may require more frequent review for some studies, while the requirement for continuing review may be waived for other studies. Your approval letter will clearly list the study's expiration date, or it will state that there is no expiration date.

Continuing review reminders from Research Gateway IRB (ReGI)

Research Gateway IRB (ReGI) sends out several courtesy continuing review reminders to the Principal Investigator (PI), invididuals designed as PI Proxy, and the primary contact well before a study expires. However, it is ultimately the PI's responsibility to keep track of when the continuing review is due and to submit a continuing review application at least 6 weeks before the expiration date to allow for review and re-approval. Per federal regulations, extensions cannot be granted for Continuing Review.

🌐Continuing Reviews for Relying Sites (pSites)

The UCSF study team should send out the HRP-812: Site Continuing Review form to each of the relying sites as early as 3 months prior to expiration.  We recommend that all parties put a reminder in their calendars since you will need to start prior to receiving ReGI notifications. 

Once the forms are completed and signed they should be given to the UCSF study, who will then upload them in the Continuing Review SmartForm.

❌When is Continuing Review Not Required? 

Exempt studies do not lapse and do not require continuing review.

There is also a subsection of expedited and full committee studies that, per 45 CFR 46.109(f) of the 2018 Common Rule requirements, are eligible to have no lapse date and thereby do not require annual continuing review. Please see the below tables below for a description of the scenarios in which a study may be eligible.

Note: Even if your study meets the criteria below, please do not assume that it doesn’t require continuing review. Your approval letter will either include an expiration date if you need to renew each year, or it will indicate that the study has no expiration date. This determination is made by the IRB.

Studies initially approved ON or AFTER 1/21/2019 may be eligible for “Nolapse” status if they meet the following criteria:

Study Status / Review Level
  1. Expedited
  2. Expedited- No Subject Contact
Consent Form Requirements

If there are study consent forms, the following elements are included:

  1. Study summary (not required if consent is 6 pages or fewer)
  2. Statement about whether study data may/will/will not be deidentified and shared for future research (always required)
  3. Statements about whole genome sequencing, and/or return of results, and/or sharing in commercial profits (only required if applicable to the study)

Note: These requirements are included in our Consent & Assent Form Templates.

Exclusions

Studies are not eligible for “No lapse” if any of the following conditions exist:

  1. The study involves FDA funding and/or FDA oversight (the study involves drugs, devices, assays, or biologics)
  2. The IRB Reviewer requests annual review for a specific reason
  3. It is a COVID-19 study (these need at least 1 annual renewal)
Who makes this decision and when?A voting IRB member makes this decision at the time of initial IRB review.

Studies approved BEFORE 1/21/2019 may be eligible to transition to “No expiration” status if they meet the following criteria:

Study Status / Review Level
  1. Expedited and closed to accrual
  2. Expedited - No Subject Contact
  3. Full Committee, closed to accrual, and ALL subjects have completed ALL study interventions
  4. Full Committee, closed to accrual, and in Data Analysis Only
Consent Form RequirementsThe study is either “no subject contact” or closed to accrual, therefore there should not be any active consent forms.
Exclusions

Studies are not eligible for transition to a “No lapse” status if either of the following conditions exist:

  1. The study involves FDA funding and/or FDA oversight (the study involves drugs, devices, assays, or biologics)
  2. The IRB Reviewer requests annual review for a specific reason
Who decides if the study can be transitioned and when?A voting IRB member makes this decision at the time of continuing review.

If the IRB determines that your study is eligible for “No expiration,” your approval letter will clearly indicate that there is no expiration date.

Expedited and Full Committee studies without expiration dates are still under the oversight of the IRB, which means that:

  • The IRB may still request periodic updates on the status of the study.
  • You are still required to submit modifications, Reportable New Information - RNI (reportable adverse events, protocol violations, incidents) and closeout reports as usual.
Please do not submit requests to the IRB for your study to not have an expiration date. This determination is made by the IRB at the time of initial or continuing review, based on specific regulatory criteria.

⚠️If Approval Expires

If approval expires, ALL RESEARCH ACTIVITIES INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS MUST STOP, even if the continuing review application has been submitted to the IRB. Research activities include, but are not limited to, study visits, medical records review and data analysis.

The only exception is that activities needed for participant safety should continue; please fill out and return this form and submit a protocol violation form if this occurs. No new subjects may be enrolled.

If any project activity occurs or continues after the expiration date, the investigator is out of compliance with both federal regulations and University policy. Retrospective approval for work done after the expiration date cannot be granted.

The IRB will not consider requests to continue studies that have been expired for more than 60 days. If more than 60 days have passed since expiration, the PI will be required to submit a new study to the IRB for review and approval. If there are consent forms, they must follow the current IRB consent form templates.

If 60 days or fewer have passed since expiration, the PI will be required to submit a Continuing Review with the rationale for why the study was allowed to expire, along with a strong justification for why the study should be reactivated. The IRB reserves the right to deny the request or require the submission of a new study.

Example: "The expiration date is 2/2/2027." This means the study will expire at 11:59 PM on 2/2/2027.

💻Submitting in Research Gateway IRB (ReGI)

  • For Greater than Minimal Risk studies, submit the Continuing Review SmartForm at least 6 weeks prior to study expiration.
  • For Minimal Risk studies, submit the Continuing Review SmartForm at least 4 weeks prior to study expiration.

Follow the steps in the Continuing Review user guide to prepare and submit the continuing review. 

Important Notes: 

  • Before creating a new Continuing Review SmartForm: If someone other than the PI will submit this to the IRB, they must be listed as a PI Proxy for the study before the Continuing Review SmartForm is started. If not done already, the PI should add the study team members of their choosing to the PI Proxy role. See the user guide: Assign PI Proxies.
  • You DO NOT need to attach consent documents that you plan to use during the next approval period.
     

🔍IRB Review Process for Continuing Reviews

Studies initially reviewed as full committee

These submissions will be reviewed by the full committee at a convened meeting unless certain conditions apply.

Studies initially reviewed as full committee, now eligible for expedited review

If one of the following apply, the continuing review can be reviewed under the expedited review procedures:

  1. The research is permanently closed to the enrollment of new participants and the research remains active only for long-term follow-up, such as medical records review and telephone follow-up. (If one of the research follow-up procedures is an intervention such as a blood draw or an x-ray, the continuing review is not eligible for expedited review.)
  2. No participants have ever been enrolled and no additional risks have been identified since the last full committee review.
  3. The remaining research activities are limited to data analysis.
Studies initially reviewed as expedited review

These submissions can be reviewed under the expedited review procedures if the study procedures continue to qualify for expedited review.

Last updated: